NONSUCH-L Archives – March 2009, week 4

1. B&G Instruments
   • B&G Instruments (119 lines)
     From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:30:58 -0400
   • Re: B&G Instruments (179 lines)
     From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:25:53 -0400

2. Battery Maintainance
   • Re: Battery Maintainance (164 lines)
     From: John Newell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:45:34 -0400

3. Best Improvement
   • Re: Best Improvement (210 lines)
     From: Mark Powers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:21:12 -0700
   • Re: Best Improvement (263 lines)
     From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:44:39 -0400
   • Re: Best Improvement (162 lines)
     From: Kenneth A. Verhaeren <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:36:58 -0400
   • Re: Best Improvement (205 lines)
     From: Jack Lombard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:07:02 +0000
   • Re: Best Improvement (364 lines)
     From: Mark Powers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:12:03 -0700
   • Re: Best Improvement (299 lines)
     From: Jon Matthews <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:52:21 -0400
   • Re: Best Improvement (443 lines)
     From: Brooks Bridges <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:59:52 -0700
   • Re: Best Improvement (499 lines)
     From: Mark Powers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:39:54 -0700
   • Re: Best Improvement (538 lines)
     From: Ray & Vida Barrick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:04:17 -0400

4. Dog Boarding
   • Dog Boarding (75 lines)
     From: Brian Adamson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:38:02 -0700
   • Re: Dog Boarding (22 lines)
     From: Bill Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:51:32 -0400
   • Re: Dog Boarding (171 lines)
     From: Ron & Diane Schryver <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:28:54 -0400
   • Re: Dog Boarding (60 lines)
     From: Richard Lane <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:01:17 -0700

5. Down By the Bow?
   • Re: Down By the Bow? (58 lines)
     From: Richard Fried <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:34:02 -0400
   • Re: Down By the Bow? (85 lines)
     From: Joel Watt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:07:40 -0400
   • Re: Down By the Bow? (44 lines)
     From: Richard Fried <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:57:15 -0400

6. FW: K-100 MD
   • FW: K-100 MD (59 lines)
     From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:44:13 -0400

7. FW: who was Pete?
   • FW: who was Pete? (464 lines)
     From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:08:47 -0400

8. hand crank engine starting
   • hand crank engine starting (215 lines)
     From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:52:47 -0400

9. Holding tank "plug"
   • Holding tank "plug" (134 lines)
     From: lloyd & julie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:01:59 -0400
   • Re: Holding tank "plug" (176 lines)
     From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:38:42 -0400
   • Re: Holding tank "plug" (265 lines)
     From: Michel Fortin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:23:24 -0400

10. icebox drain on 26U
    • icebox drain on 26U (59 lines)
      From: Paul Gross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:57:02 -0400
    • Re: icebox drain on 26U (127 lines)
      From: james chamberlain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:44:02 -0400
    • Re: icebox drain on 26U (354 lines)
      From: Henry Poole <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:46:02 -0400
    • Re: icebox drain on 26U (92 lines)
      From: Brian Bouch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:16 -0700

11. insignia for new sail
    • insignia for new sail (35 lines)
      From: Paul Gross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:26:50 -0400
    • Re: insignia for new sail (28 lines)
      From: Bill Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:44:41 -0400
    • Re: insignia for new sail (41 lines)
      From: Christine and Graeme Morrissey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:18:15 -0400

12. Intriguing Opinion from Supposed Moral Authority
    • Re: Intriguing Opinion from Supposed Moral Authority (102 lines)
      From: Kristen Posey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:16:32 -0700

13. K 100 MD
    • K 100 MD (53 lines)
      From: Joel Watt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:57:46 -0400

14. K-100 MD
    • K-100 MD (19 lines)
      From: Joel Watt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:40:40 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (64 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:20:51 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (36 lines)
      From: Douglas Hall <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:56:41 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (34 lines)
      From: Jon Matthews <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:26:37 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (19 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:42:24 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (210 lines)
      From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:40:26 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (270 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:22:47 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (266 lines)
      From: John iscaro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:35:19 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (51 lines)
      From: Jon Matthews <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:44:24 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (67 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:20:16 +0000
    • Re: K-100 MD (19 lines)
      From: Bill Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:41:54 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:18:15 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD (40 lines)
      From: Alan Bennett-Steward <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:28:29 EDT
    • K-100 MD (87 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:53:09 -0400

15. K-100 MD et al.
    • Re: K-100 MD et al. (68 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:07:11 -0700
    • Re: K-100 MD et al. (21 lines)
      From: Bill Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:30:50 -0400
    • Re: K-100 MD et al. (147 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:50:02 -0400

16. Kiwi Prop
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (292 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:02:17 -0700
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (690 lines)
      From: Peter Butler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:32:35 -0700
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (1029 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:20:41 -0400
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (984 lines)
      From: John Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:49:13 -0700
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (1688 lines)
      From: Bob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:28:33 -0600
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (237 lines)
      From: John Newell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:54:53 -0400
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (47 lines)
      From: <Don Clare> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:42:45 EDT
    • Re: Kiwi Prop (103 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:44:49 -0400

17. Letter of Note
    • Letter of Note (94 lines)
      From: Richard Fried <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:52:16 -0400

18. New Sub, Battery Maintainance
    • Re: New Sub, Battery Maintainance (158 lines)
      From: james chamberlain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:50:56 -0400

19. New Sub, Going Melville
    • Re: New Sub, Going Melville (441 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:06:42 -0700

20. New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder?
    • New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (259 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:45:32 -0400
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (232 lines)
      From: Kristen Posey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:46:10 -0700
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (333 lines)
      From: Ed Botterell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:59:40 -0400
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (124 lines)
      From: pbutler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:31:31 -0700
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (340 lines)
      From: Kristen Posey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:33:40 -0700
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (153 lines)
      From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:15:33 -0400
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (58 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:33:59 -0400
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (235 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:38:24 -0700
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (235 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:38:25 -0700
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (117 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:47:09 -0400
    • Re: New Sub, The Electric Boat a new trend or a one off wonder? (105 lines)
      From: Lorie Simone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:35:14 -0400

21. Non electric diesel.
    • Re: Non electric diesel. (168 lines)
      From: Jack Lombard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:56:34 +0000

22. Non electric diesel?
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (90 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:28:10 -0700
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (178 lines)
      From: John Newell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:24:40 -0400
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (191 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:53:50 -0700
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (20 lines)
      From: Bill Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:15:46 -0400
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (309 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:52:55 -0400
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (69 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:55:50 -0700
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (138 lines)
      From: Kristen Posey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:27:14 -0700
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (147 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:45:25 -0400
    • Re: Non electric diesel? (386 lines)
      From: Greg Silver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:55:44 -0300

23. Propeller
    • Re: Propeller (396 lines)
      From: Inmartech <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:08:43 +0100

24. rebedding the propeller shaft strut
    • Re: rebedding the propeller shaft strut (125 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:24:26 -0700
    • Re: rebedding the propeller shaft strut (176 lines)
      From: Peter Thornton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:35:54 -0700
    • Re: rebedding the propeller shaft strut (125 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:35:40 EDT

25. rebedding the propeller shaft strut water pump cover removal
    • Re: rebedding the propeller shaft strut water pump cover removal (116 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:47:25 -0700

26. Russ's squeeze
    • Russ's squeeze (63 lines)
      From: Ed Botterell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:21:21 -0400

27. Russ's squeeze & MANY DOM
    • Re: Russ's squeeze & MANY DOM (186 lines)
      From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:26:08 -0400

28. solar power
    • Re: solar power (363 lines)
      From: Mark Powers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:33:40 -0700

29. Subject changed from "Kiwi Prop" to "transom moustache"
    • Subject changed from "Kiwi Prop" to "transom moustache" (112 lines)
      From: Timothy Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:30:51 -0400

30. VC-17 what volume required
    • VC-17 what volume required (19 lines)
      From: Jim Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:13:02 -0400

31. who was Pete?
    • Re: who was Pete? (323 lines)
      From: james chamberlain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:11:48 -0400