NONSUCH-L Archives – February 2009, week 1

1. Bogging down
   • Re: Bogging down (21 lines)
     From: Allen Ames <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:25:13 -0500
   • Re: Bogging down (110 lines)
     From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:20:34 -0500

2. Bottom painting
   • Re: Bottom painting (232 lines)
     From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:46:36 -0800
   • Re: Bottom painting (89 lines)
     From: Christopher Copeland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:57:05 +0000
   • Re: Bottom painting (376 lines)
     From: David Young <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:44:00 -0500
   • Re: Bottom painting (216 lines)
     From: <Don Clare> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 15:59:25 -0500
   • Re: Bottom painting (232 lines)
     From: Joseph L. Tierney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:22:14 -0500

3. Electric Nonsuch & windpower
   • Re: Electric Nonsuch & windpower (237 lines)
     From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:46:46 -0800
   • Re: Electric Nonsuch & windpower (378 lines)
     From: John iscaro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:16:59 -0500

4. Engine Bogging Down
   • Engine Bogging Down (75 lines)
     From: Wayne Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:34:32 -0500
   • Re: Engine Bogging Down (157 lines)
     From: Geza R. Banfai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:06:03 -0500
   • Re: Engine Bogging Down (142 lines)
     From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:34:43 -0500
   • Re: Engine Bogging Down (242 lines)
     From: Allen Perrins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:51:56 -0500

5. fresh water plumbing
   • fresh water plumbing (27 lines)
     From: bill evans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:01:54 -0800
   • Re: fresh water plumbing (66 lines)
     From: Joseph L. Tierney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:36:18 -0500
   • Re: fresh water plumbing (379 lines)
     From: William Baxter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:29:39 -0500
   • Re: fresh water plumbing (502 lines)
     From: lloyd & julie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:03:23 -0500
   • Re: fresh water plumbing (30 lines)
     From: STEVE BOSCO <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:55:27 -0800
   • Re: fresh water plumbing (200 lines)
     From: bill evans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:18:03 -0800

6. Grey water odour
   • Re: Grey water odour (92 lines)
     From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:00:27 -0800

7. invaluable safety equipment
   • invaluable safety equipment (234 lines)
     From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:56:41 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (105 lines)
     From: Bruce Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:29:05 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (314 lines)
     From: Geza R. Banfai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:02:48 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (761 lines)
     From: Dick Darrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:29:11 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (187 lines)
     From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:00:06 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (136 lines)
     From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:58:58 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (177 lines)
     From: Joseph Payea <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:11:42 -0800
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (84 lines)
     From: Bruce Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:46:45 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (44 lines)
     From: Jerry Stange <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:52:05 -0500
   • Re: invaluable safety equipment (31 lines)
     From: Richard Lane <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:22:03 -0800

8. IRRESISTABLE offer !
   • IRRESISTABLE offer ! (166 lines)
     From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:52:09 -0500
   • Re: IRRESISTABLE offer ! (18 lines)
     From: Bill Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:37:49 -0500
   • Re: IRRESISTABLE offer ! (55 lines)
     From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:02:52 -0800

9. list
   • list (24 lines)
     From: <Don Clare> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:22:19 -0500

10. MAX-PROP SETTING
    • MAX-PROP SETTING (88 lines)
      From: Fred Rachwitz E-mail account <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:51:54 -0500
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (425 lines)
      From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:53:02 -0500
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (140 lines)
      From: Jon Ayers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:09:05 -0500
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (149 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:56:59 -0800
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (191 lines)
      From: Allen Perrins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:58:32 -0500
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (240 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:42:15 -0500
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (137 lines)
      From: Brooks Bridges <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:44:14 -0800
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (92 lines)
      From: Joseph Payea <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:44 -0800
    • Re: MAX-PROP SETTING (200 lines)
      From: Joseph L. Tierney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:52:15 -0500

11. MAX-PROP SETTING & bottoms
    • MAX-PROP SETTING & bottoms (515 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:15:12 -0500

12. new subject, Un-named
    • Re: new subject, Un-named (359 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:17:39 -0500

13. no moustache
    • no moustache (174 lines)
      From: Arthur Langley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:05:49 -0500

14. No Power...Need to charge
    • No Power...Need to charge (19 lines)
      From: Jim Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:02:19 -0500
    • Re: No Power...Need to charge (30 lines)
      From: Bruce Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:54:40 -0500
    • Re: No Power...Need to charge (30 lines)
      From: Jerry Stange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:33:52 -0500
    • Re: No Power...Need to charge (85 lines)
      From: Mike <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:09:17 -0800
    • Re: No Power...Need to charge (227 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:49:43 -0500
    • Re: No Power...Need to charge (52 lines)
      From: Allen Perrins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:04:04 -0500

15. Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13
    • Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (126 lines)
      From: Bob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:56:00 -0700
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (114 lines)
      From: Jim Winslow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:26:41 -0800
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (189 lines)
      From: Allen Perrins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:28:43 -0500
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (692 lines)
      From: Dick Darrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:57:58 -0500
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (44 lines)
      From: james chamberlain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:22:08 -0500
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (162 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:47:24 -0500
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (103 lines)
      From: bob skitmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:17:31 -0700
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (391 lines)
      From: Peter Tomlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:35:59 -0500
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (138 lines)
      From: Jerry Stange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:02:02 -0500
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (160 lines)
      From: bob skitmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:34:10 -0700
    • Re: Replacing Hoses on Westerbeke 13 (244 lines)
      From: John Newell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:04:02 -0500

16. West Marine CPP
    • West Marine CPP (51 lines)
      From: Bill Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:36:44 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (127 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:08:13 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (169 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:14:39 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (109 lines)
      From: Steve Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:37:10 -0800
    • Re: West Marine CPP (267 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:15:34 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (213 lines)
      From: Jim Worden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:57:41 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (381 lines)
      From: John F Grainger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:24:14 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (346 lines)
      From: Joe Valinoti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:31:23 -0500
    • Re: West Marine CPP (257 lines)
      From: Jim Worden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:44:45 -0500

17. Western CT Coast
    • Re: Western CT Coast (29 lines)
      From: Bill Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:42:40 -0500