COTTON-L Archives – February 2002

1. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (27 lines)
     From: Nathan Handmacher <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:03:01 -0600
   • <No subject> (67 lines)
     From: Andy Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:07:29 -0600
   • <No subject> (16 lines)
     From: Mark Marion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:00:19 -0800

2. A Question In My Old Age
   • A Question In My Old Age (38 lines)
     From: Don Shurley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:06:31 -0500
   • Re: A Question In My Old Age (123 lines)
     From: Wayne Bjorlie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:43:32 -0500
   • Re: A Question In My Old Age (33 lines)
     From: William Robert Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:32:46 -0600
   • Re: A Question In My Old Age (26 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:39:34 EST
   • Re: A Question In My Old Age (75 lines)
     From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:42:38 -0800
   • Re: A Question In My Old Age (85 lines)
     From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:54:54 -0800

3. Administrivia: Periodic post of cotton-l policies
   • Administrivia: Periodic post of cotton-l policies (87 lines)
     From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:46:12 -0600

4. another thought on Grassley
   • another thought on Grassley (16 lines)
     From: Grey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:22:56 -0600

5. Bt and Pesticides (was NNF - Genetically Modified Foods - Rou nd 6,357)
   • Re: Bt and Pesticides (was NNF - Genetically Modified Foods - Rou nd 6,357) (22 lines)
     From: Anton Doroszenko ,Content Manager, Organic Research <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:15:35 -0800
   • Re: Bt and Pesticides (was NNF - Genetically Modified Foods - Rou nd 6,357) (59 lines)
     From: Carl and Sheila Hobbs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 05:44:11 -0500
   • Re: Bt and Pesticides (was NNF - Genetically Modified Foods - Rou nd 6,357) (40 lines)
     From: Bob & Sandra Mayberry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 06:36:17 -0700

6. BWE
   • BWE (40 lines)
     From: John Starnes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:38:01 -0600
   • Re: BWE (22 lines)
     From: Daniel Mascheck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 06:09:32 -0600

7. c-span/ag vote
   • c-span/ag vote (36 lines)
     From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:01:02 -0600

8. community supported agriculture
   • Re: community supported agriculture (21 lines)
     From: William Robert Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:56:53 -0600
   • Re: community supported agriculture (33 lines)
     From: Anton Doroszenko ,Content Manager, Organic Research <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:51:34 -0800

9. Cotton farmers riot in Spain
   • Cotton farmers riot in Spain (96 lines)
     From: Jim Nunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:48:41 -0600

10. crop insurance for 2002
    • crop insurance for 2002 (20 lines)
      From: Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:57:51 -0600

11. details on Grassley
    • details on Grassley (28 lines)
      From: Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:40:30 -0600
    • Re: details on Grassley (63 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:45:54 -0800
    • Re: details on Grassley (130 lines)
      From: Cork, Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:21:03 -0600
    • Re: details on Grassley (23 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:29:14 -0600
    • Re: details on Grassley (48 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:03:31 -0800

12. DTN says 83% of us won't be affected by Grassley!
    • DTN says 83% of us won't be affected by Grassley! (24 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:42:28 -0600
    • Re: DTN says 83% of us won't be affected by Grassley! (102 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:41:37 -0800

13. Excel spreadsheets
    • Excel spreadsheets (21 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:41:50 -0800

14. Farm Bill Conference
    • Farm Bill Conference (38 lines)
      From: Andy Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:39:40 -0600
    • Re: Farm Bill Conference (47 lines)
      From: Lowell Zelinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:42:57 -0800
    • Re: Farm Bill Conference (106 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:00:35 -0800
    • Re: Farm Bill Conference (19 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:44:53 -0600
    • Re: Farm Bill Conference (26 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:11:00 -0800
    • Re: Farm Bill Conference (64 lines)
      From: Woody Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:24:50 -0500

15. Farm Bill Update
    • Farm Bill Update (142 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:53:54 -0600

16. Farm bill update/Grassley amendment
    • Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (40 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:00:43 -0600
    • Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (21 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:04:45 -0600
    • Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (35 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:26:01 -0600
    • Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (51 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:58:03 EST
    • Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:42:53 EST

17. Forwarded per subscriber request
    • Forwarded per subscriber request (81 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:25:34 -0600

18. FW: NNF - Genetically Modified Foods - Round 6,357
    • FW: NNF - Genetically Modified Foods - Round 6,357 (76 lines)
      From: Cork, Warren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:21:15 -0600

19. Fw: PANUPS: International Bodies Urged to Halt Maize Contamination
    • Fw: PANUPS: International Bodies Urged to Halt Maize Contamination (164 lines)
      From: G Certain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:01:55 -0600

20. Fwd: Cap on Farm Payments Threatens Bill
    • Fwd: Cap on Farm Payments Threatens Bill (88 lines)
      From: B.B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:44:16 -0600

21. Fwd: Cheney Meets With California Farmers / Farm Scene [Feb 21]
    • Fwd: Cheney Meets With California Farmers / Farm Scene [Feb 21] (51 lines)
      From: B.B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:06:06 -0600

22. Fwd: New Amendment
    • Fwd: New Amendment (43 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:26:58 -0600

23. Fwd: Senator, Agriculture Chief Clash
    • Fwd: Senator, Agriculture Chief Clash (71 lines)
      From: B.B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:33:00 -0600

24. Fwd: US concerned about trade impact of new Chinese biotech rules
    • Fwd: US concerned about trade impact of new Chinese biotech rules (50 lines)
      From: B.B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:55:28 -0600

25. Fwd: White House Wants Crop Subsidies Low
    • Fwd: White House Wants Crop Subsidies Low (62 lines)
      From: B.B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:53:40 -0600

26. Grassley
    • Grassley (13 lines)
      From: Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:24:50 -0600

27. Grassley Amendment
    • Grassley Amendment (14 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:02:34 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (21 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:44:23 -0800
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (25 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:03:27 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:19:42 EST
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (21 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:25:53 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (39 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:34:56 -0800
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (49 lines)
      From: Sledge Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:28:45 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:39:22 EST
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:42:43 EST
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (23 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:28:44 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (25 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:37:40 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (39 lines)
      From: Reinbott, David L. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:09:51 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Amendment (47 lines)
      From: William Robert Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:49:58 -0600

28. Grassley Dorgan Ammendment
    • Grassley Dorgan Ammendment (52 lines)
      From: Andy Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:01:40 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Dorgan Ammendment (27 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:02:04 -0600
    • Re: Grassley Dorgan Ammendment (39 lines)
      From: Nathan Handmacher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:44:19 -0600

29. Grassley, Dorgan grab headlines with amendment
    • Grassley, Dorgan grab headlines with amendment (40 lines)
      From: Carl Hobbs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:15:40 -0500
    • Re: Grassley, Dorgan grab headlines with amendment (24 lines)
      From: Gordon Couger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:09:20 -0600

30. House Ag Committee website source on farm bill conference
    • House Ag Committee website source on farm bill conference (27 lines)
      From: Phil McKibben <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:04:31 -0600
    • Re: House Ag Committee website source on farm bill conference (11 lines)
      From: Bob Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:59:46 -0600

31. Ken Egger- Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment
    • Ken Egger- Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (154 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:39:54 -0600
    • Re: Ken Egger- Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (191 lines)
      From: Fletcher Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:54:36 -0500
    • Re: Ken Egger- Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (156 lines)
      From: Lowell Zelinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:54:45 -0800
    • Re: Ken Egger- Re: Farm bill update/Grassley amendment (20 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:19:10 -0600

32. Loan Chart
    • Loan Chart (19 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:00:42 -0600
    • Re: Loan Chart (123 lines)
      From: Dan Kemble <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 08:49:07 -0800

33. Miss Farm Bureau
    • Miss Farm Bureau (227 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:15:56 -0600

34. More on the negative side of EWG
    • More on the negative side of EWG (385 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:55:37 -0800

35. Payment Limits Support
    • Payment Limits Support (30 lines)
      From: Carl and Sheila Hobbs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 06:01:45 -0500

36. Plain English Grassley
    • Plain English Grassley (16 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:40:50 -0600

37. recourse loans
    • Re: recourse loans (31 lines)
      From: Bob Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:21:01 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (18 lines)
      From: Jim Dickerson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:00:23 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (45 lines)
      From: Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:40:08 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (78 lines)
      From: Don Shurley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:35:05 -0500
    • Re: recourse loans (13 lines)
      From: Dirk Dimitry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:00:11 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (69 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:17:23 -0800
    • Re: recourse loans (39 lines)
      From: Don Shurley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:06:51 -0500
    • Re: recourse loans (39 lines)
      From: Bob Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:07:09 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (25 lines)
      From: Bob Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:22:45 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (22 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:55:55 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (43 lines)
      From: Grey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:29:43 -0600
    • Re: recourse loans (77 lines)
      From: Jim Nunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:06:24 -0600

38. recourse loans - mkt assn's
    • Re: recourse loans - mkt assn's (39 lines)
      From: William Robert Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:09:26 -0600

39. replay of conf. call
    • replay of conf. call (42 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:48:33 -0600

40. Senate OKs Cap on Farm Payments
    • Senate OKs Cap on Farm Payments (142 lines)
      From: Frank Weathersby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:38:32 -0600

41. Senate vote
    • Senate vote (30 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:41:59 -0800

42. Senator Sessions meeting
    • Re: Senator Sessions meeting (53 lines)
      From: Bob Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:40:39 -0600
    • Re: Senator Sessions meeting (64 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:57:50 -0800
    • Re: Senator Sessions meeting (38 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:10:23 -0600
    • Re: Senator Sessions meeting (22 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:12:13 -0600
    • Re: Senator Sessions meeting (67 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:48:10 -0800
    • Re: Senator Sessions meeting (20 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:13:40 -0600

43. the Ghastly Amendment
    • Re: the Ghastly Amendment (98 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:53:14 -0800
    • Re: the Ghastly Amendment (324 lines)
      From: Chuck Gullord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:06:59 -0800
    • Re: the Ghastly Amendment (630 lines)
      From: Lowell J Zelinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:12:15 -0800

44. the press is fighting back
    • Re: the press is fighting back (48 lines)
      From: Sledge Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:37:16 -0600
    • Re: the press is fighting back (19 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:53:13 -0600
    • Re: the press is fighting back (22 lines)
      From: Sledge Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:04:06 -0600

45. The press is fighting back...
    • The press is fighting back... (87 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:47:24 -0800

46. website source on Farm Bill Conference
    • website source on Farm Bill Conference (79 lines)
      From: Mike Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:59:28 -0600

47. White House Wants Crop Subsidies Low
    • Re: White House Wants Crop Subsidies Low (86 lines)
      From: Mark Bagby <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:08:32 -0800
    • Re: White House Wants Crop Subsidies Low (20 lines)
      From: Barry B. Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:27:52 -0600